A Remembrance of Stan Sapiro
Mason Gaffney
[
GroundSwell, January-February 2005]
To live is to be fated to die; death has come to Stanley Sapiro.
We have lost a Great Georgist who was also a Great Man, rating a
2-column obit in the L.A. Times, a newspaper he had often excoriated
because it "never met a sales tax it didn't like". We have
also lost a Great Lawyer, a Great Scholar, a Great Family Man, and a
Great and Generous Friend. Los Angeles knew him well as an activist
in court. He had sued the Assessor of L.A. County to hurry up and
raise the taxable valuation of Malibu lands held speculatively by
then-Governor Ronald Reagan. Stan won, and Reagan's land taxes rose
by a factor of six. When the California Supreme Court dawdled over
the case, he sued Chief Justice Rose Bird to follow the Constitution
and hurry it up, which she then had to do. In 1971 he sued the
Assessor to hurry up and deny preferential low tax valuations to
private country clubs that discriminate against Jews and other
ethnic groups. In this case, amazingly, the Calif. Supreme Court
ruled the private country clubs may continue to exclude Jews and
others, while still enjoying their low tax valuations. One of the
most powerful Jewish communities in the country might have taken the
lead, but private Jewish country clubs may also exclude gentiles, by
inference. It took our man Stanley to bring a case in the general
public interest, and challenge the whole notion of underassessing
the land of any private country club.
As his last hurrah, Stanley sued the powerful Lincoln Foundation
to make it carry out John C. Lincoln's will to propagate the ideas
of Henry George as expressed in Progress and Poverty. Stan
researched the case prodigiously, as was his wont, but by now his
physical powers were waning and he had to turn the case over to
others. It was an uphill battle fought on the defendant's home turf
of Arizona; it finally stalled on a technicality. Through it all,
however, Stan maintained friendly rapport with David Lincoln
himself, just as he had earlier with Ronald Reagan. There was mutual
respect there, and it is still to be hoped that Stan's earnest
endeavors may have touched David's conscience.
The United States has more than one million lawyers. If just 1%
of them were inspired to follow Stan's course in life, think of the
revolutionary effect of 10,000 activist lawyers prompting public
officials and eleemosynary directors to do their duties. Where now
is the Divine Mold that cast Stan Sapiro? If it would strike some
more in his image, what a great world this would be. As Stan showed,
it's not just writing good laws or bequests, it is enforcing them
that can save the world. Stan once sought public office, too, but,
like Henry George, found his higher calling in another kind of
public service.
Readers of Stan and Marion's "Insights" in Groundswell
know Stan as a researcher, too. He gave us opinions, but he backed
up each one with names, dates, places, numbers, and particulars,
like the lawyer that he was, preparing for a trial. He wrote "Insights"
from May, 1990, nearly to date - an op-ed so meaty that the whole
series warrants publication as a serious scholarly book. Years of
practicing law in a warren of world celebrities supplied his long
antennae with extraordinary insights into land speculation by the
rich and famous. Among his targets besides Reagan, to pique reader
interest, were Bob Hope, the Disney Company and its overpaid
executives, Marlon Brando, Dean Martin, Edie Adams, and Jack Benny.
He also took on the major landowners of Orange County: the O'Neills
and the Irvine Company. He exposed the "Redevelopment District"
swindle, and porkbarreling of all kinds. He had the goods on their
bads.
He linked the piquant and topical with vignettes from history, of
which he was a deep student. His brain was his computer, with vast
storage space for things most of us forget, if we ever knew them.
More than storing and retrieving facts, Stan's synapses, always
firing actively, made significant links that mere electronics and
canned programs would never detect. He saw the connectedness of
history with current events, and of all things and people and events
with each other. He treated his readers to short courses in, among
other topics:
- A history of the poll tax, back to King Herod
- A history of the Russian Revolution
- The life and times of Leo Tolstoy
- History and purpose of the Calif. State Board of Equalization
- Cuban land monopolists under Batista
- Child labor laws
- Economics in The Bible
- A history of income taxation
- The Oklahoma land rush of 1889
- Robert Mugabe's suppression of Georgism in Zimbabwe
- A concise history of the anti-trust laws
- The baleful effects of Proposition 13 in California
- A history of welfare programs
He saw both sides of issues. While hawkish at times, he wrote of
how the IMF et al. subsidize tyrants who hold down wage rates while
landowners pay no taxes; and he chronicled the life of a pacifist he
admired, Leo Tolstoy.
Some critics tried to dismiss him as narrow, but Stan, reading
widely, quoted from such varied writers as Goethe, Thoreau, FDR,
Andrew Jackson, Jonathan Swift, W.S. Gilbert, Fred Allen, J.S. Mill,
The Bible, Carl Schurz, Mark Twain, Adam Smith, Joseph Fels, David
Stockman, Michael Boskin, Eddie Cantor, Andrew Carnegie, and John D.
Rockefeller: some to extol and some to scorn, but all to edify and
entertain.
Goodbye, Stan, I loved you well, as did many others. Your spirit
lives on in the lives you have touched. It is now for us, the
living, to take from your life increased devotion to that cause for
which you gave the last full measure of yours.